Curiosity gets the best of the boys and as they go from cage to cage, they discover the ten animals - a wolf, a lioness, a monkey, a seal, a kangaroo, an eagle, a chamois, a bear, a llama and a boar - are still alive, though they are a neglected, starving menagerie. But while they are exploring, planes flying overhead begin to drop bombs on the already ruined village once again.
And when the planes leave, to be amazement of the boys, the animals start talking. As night unfolds, they tell the two boys about the zoo, the zookeeper and his daughter, Alice. Alice loved and cared for the animals but when the Leader's soldiers invaded their country, Alice became a resistance fighter. Within the safety of the zoo, she and the other resistance fighters planned a way to sabotage an enemy train. The sabotage was successful, but the Leader became very angry and took revenge on the village, continually bombing it even though nothing is left but the zoo. Alice had to go into hiding in the mountains, but promised the animals that she would return.
As night wears on, each of the animals tell the boys how they came to be caged in the zoo. And the boys share their story with the animals. Each story is different, but each shares a common thread - loss of family, loss of freedom. I don't want to go into detail about their individual stories, because I think would spoil it for any future readers. They should be read not synopsized.
The novel is always referred to as a WW2 story and it certainly sounds like one. Hartnett has said that she really hates the idea of having to tell the reader "everything in clunking detail," but it is easy enough to flush out details that correspond to events in the novel. The reference to the Leader reminds us that Hitler was also called der Führer (the leader). The fact that the boys are Romany places the novel in Eastern Europe, and the invaders remind us of the German soldiers who invaded Czechoslovakia. When Alice and her friends sabotage the enemy train, a close friend of the Leader is killed, a parallel of the killing of Hitler's friend and Gestapo head Reinhard Heydrich in Prague in 1942. Angered and wanting revenge, Hitler ordered the massacre of Lidice.
I think that Hartnett deliberately kept these facts and events vague for two other reasons. First, she may have wanted this to be an ageless fable, not one that only relates to WW2, but to all conflicts. And second, because, as she said in an interview, she wants the reader to be "...part of the experience that is a book, and I like the reader to have some input into the creation of the work - to decide what happens in the end, if need be."
This second reason may be why there are so many mixed reactions to The Midnight Zoo. The story just doesn't have a tidy ending. But there is a tidy ending - the children and the animals find the elusive freedom they crave. How they find it isn't so tidy and depends on how you read some of Hartnetts's hints (my interpretation is below)
The Midnight Zoo is one of the most lyrically written books I have ever read. Hartnett masterfully combines realism , magical realism and personification to create an almost dream-like fable reminding us of the destructive nature of war. Accompanying the text are soft, almost ethereal black and white illustrations by Andrea Offermann at the beginning of each chapter, as you can see below, and full color cover illustration.
This book is recommended for readers age 10+ but I would age it at 12+
This book was purchased for my personal library
A PDF copy of an extensive teaching guide by Dr. Pam Macintyre for The Midnight Zoo can be found HERE
This is book 13 of my 2013 Historical Fiction Reading Challenge hosted by Historical Tapestry
**Not really a Spoiler, but my interpretation of the ending**
This sounds like a fascinating book. I didn't read your interpretation of the ending yet, because I want to read it first and then see what you think of the end. I love that this book sounds so well written. Thanks for the introduction. :)ReplyDelete
Maybe i missed it, but what was the name of the group who "...reminds us of the Germans...", i think it was something like Gadge?ReplyDelete
Also, don't you find it fascinating how after the bombs hit at the end of chapter 3 (no spoiler intended), it is the first time the animals begin to talk, and how when the children wake up, they hear their mother's voice when really it is the lioness' who has the same human characteristics as their mother. I also agree that the moment of their death is at the end, but am stuck in between the possibility that the cloaked woman could either be their guardian angels, the virgin mary, mother of jesus, as they are envisioned as what the animals and children wish to see. However, on a more darker side (which seems to fit the theme of the book), the cloaked woman could also be death herself, welcoming them into the afterlife? I'm not sure. I'm leaning towards the death concept, as this book seems to be dark, unless the author intended it to be a (somewhat) happy ending. Thanks for your ideas! Really helpful :)ReplyDelete
Thank you! This is a great analogy! Also, I did some thinking about what you said about the lioness having their mother's characteristics..... Do you think that maybe at the end of chapter three they go into a deep sleep/coma after the impact of the bombs, and the character's loved ones could be using the animals to communicate through the children's conscience? The children could decide to stay behind with the animals because they realised that the key to the animal's (and their own) freedom is, in fact, death? I actually believe that this book, the title, the story, and even the setting, could be a metaphor. This story, I think, is not just one night of their lives.ReplyDelete
I don't know, I could be wrong, but something about what you said really got me thinking...